bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "Luke 3:27"

Luke 3:27

Definition: Which was [the son] of Joanna, which was [the son] of Rhesa, which was [the son] of Zorobabel, which was [the son] of Salathiel, which was [the son] of Neri,


Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Luke 3:27. It's a really interesting and somewhat mysterious detail about the birth of Jesus! Here’s what it means in simple terms: Basically, this verse tells us that Jesus was born to a family with a very long and complicated history – a lineage stretching back many generations. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Which was…” : This is a way of saying “This is the person who was born.” “…the son…” : This means Jesus was the offspring of this particular family. “…of Joanna, which was…” : Joanna was a woman named in Luke’s account. She's mentioned as being involved with Jesus’ mother. “…of Rhesa…” : “Rhesa” is a name from the ancient Near East. It’s often linked to a powerful king or ruler. “…which was…” : Again, this refers back to the family listed before. “…of Zorobabel…” : "Zorobabel" is an ancient name for King Solomon, and it's significant because of the Temple in Jerusalem. “…which was…” : This continues to connect him to the lineage of David and Jesus’ ancestors. “…of Salathiel…” : “Salathiel” is another ancient name, linked to the kings of Judah. “…of Neri…” : "Neri" is a name that’s connected to the royal line of David. So, putting it all together: This family was incredibly important and had a long history – they were descendants of David, who was the King of Israel, and a royal line back to Solomon. Jesus was born to this particular branch of that line. Why is this significant? The fact that Jesus was born to such an unusual and ancient family line adds another layer to the story of his birth – it suggests a divine connection and perhaps a more profound beginning than simply being the firstborn son of David. It's a detail that highlights the significance of his lineage and the continuity of God’s plan. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Discuss why this detail is important in the context of the Bible?